Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Detect runtime-evaluated base classes defined in the current file #8572

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 9, 2023

Conversation

charliermarsh
Copy link
Member

@charliermarsh charliermarsh commented Nov 9, 2023

Closes #8250.

Closes #5486.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2023

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

ℹ️ ecosystem check detected linter changes. (+1 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes in 41 projects)

apache/airflow (+1 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --select ALL

+ airflow/example_dags/example_dynamic_task_mapping_with_no_taskflow_operators.py:62:5: AIR001 Task variable name should match the `task_id`: "sum_it"

Changes by rule (1 rules affected)

code total + violation - violation + fix - fix
AIR001 1 1 0 0 0

Linter (preview)

ℹ️ ecosystem check detected linter changes. (+1 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes in 41 projects)

apache/airflow (+1 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --select ALL --preview

+ airflow/example_dags/example_dynamic_task_mapping_with_no_taskflow_operators.py:62:5: AIR001 Task variable name should match the `task_id`: "sum_it"

Changes by rule (1 rules affected)

code total + violation - violation + fix - fix
AIR001 1 1 0 0 0

@charliermarsh charliermarsh merged commit 722687a into main Nov 9, 2023
17 checks passed
@charliermarsh charliermarsh deleted the evanrittenhouse/runtime_eval_base_class branch November 9, 2023 03:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants